My son’s continued study of 1966’s “Batman The Movie” has forced my analytical eye to study and dissect every line, beat and angle around 50 times. It’s also forced me to like the movie more than I did two months ago, which therefore forces me to justify why I like the movie as much as I do. And the key to my current justification comes from the fact (or “fact”) that Adam West’s Batman is actually more realistic than the Nolan/Bale version.
Controversial, I know, but it works if you accept certain facts as, well, fact.
1.) Batman is a fictional character.
2.) Batman, in principle and however he is portrayed, is a ridiculous character when compared to actual real life. This means that no matter how much you explain or justify the character’s actions and technology, the core conceit — that a man would dress as a bat to fight crime — is ridiculous. That is to say, nobody would ever do this in real life, even if they could get the cape to work.
I often think about this quandary when considering the success the Nolan/Bale series has had. Many want to credit their attention to detail and their dedication to taking matters seriously. And within the movies themselves, they absolutely do. This is why I still enjoy “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight” as movies despite not liking those portrayals of Batman; within the movie world they’ve established, everything works. But when you compare it to the outside world, with all the rules of physics and society, it’s no more realistic than any other incarnation of Batman there’s ever* been.
What’s more, the campy tone of “Batman the Movie” undercuts its unparalleled realistic elements. Actually, it’s far more realistic and real world applicable than anyone should legally believe, but here I am.
Don’t believe me? Let’s look at some elements, and compare them to the “realistic” take of “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight.” Continue reading “The Adam West Batman is More Realistic Than the Nolan/Bale Batman”